India Supreme Court puts government's Rohingya deportation plans on hold

15:39  13 october  2017
15:39  13 october  2017 Source:   India Today

Sex with wife below 18 years to be considered rape, says Supreme Court

  Sex with wife below 18 years to be considered rape, says Supreme Court Sex with wife below 18 years to be considered rape, says Supreme CourtThe order comes at a time when the court is hearing petitions calling for marital rape to be declared a crime and a debate over the age of consent.

The Supreme Court today deferred the deportation of Rohingya Muslim refugees from India till its next hearing on November 21 and said there is not an "iota of doubt" that a humanitarian approach should be taken on the matter.

The Supreme Court today deferred the deportation of Rohingya Muslim refugees from India till its next hearing on November 21 and said there is not an “iota of doubt” that a humanitarian The apex court has told the Centre that needs to inform the court about any contingency plans it might have.

  Supreme Court puts government's Rohingya deportation plans on hold © India Today The Supreme Court today deferred the deportation of Rohingya Muslim refugees from India till its next hearing on November 21 and said there is not an "iota of doubt" that a humanitarian approach should be taken on the matter.

In a strongly-worded observation, the Supreme Court reminded the government that it has multiple responsibilities, and must balance national and humanitarian values. It said the Rohingya Muslims issue is of great magnitude and the state has a big role to play.

"The Constitution is based on humanitarian values. The state has a multi-pronged role. While national security and economic interests need to be secured, innocent women and children cannot be ignored," the apex court said. 

Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme Court

  Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme Court Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme CourtThe court said its order in September removing the ban would be effective from November, adding that it wants to test the effect of the ban on air quality after Diwali, the festival when millions across India celebrate by bursting crackers.

India's Supreme Court has heard arguments from the government and the two Rohingya , who have petitioned against the government ' s plan to READ MORE: Rohingya in India fear deportation to Myanmar. Ravi Nair of the South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre told Al Jazeera that the

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition filed by two immigrants, who have challenged the Two days ago, top government officials led by National Security Advisor Ajit Doval held a meeting in The United Nations' top human rights body criticised the government plan to deport Rohingyas

Deferring the matter to November 21, the Supreme Court, however, allowed the Rohingya petitioners to approach it in case of any contingency.

In pics: Where the Rohingya once lived

Aerial view of a burned Rohingya village near Maungdaw, north of Rakhine state, Myanmar. Where the Rohingya once lived

(Pictures by Reuters)

Earlier, the Centre in an affidavit had termed Rohingya refugees as "illegal" immigrants and said some of them were part of a "sinister" design of Pakistan's ISI and terror groups such as the ISIS, whose presence in the country will pose a "serious" national security threat.

The affidavit was submitted in response to a plea filed by the Rohingya immigrants, claiming they had taken refuge in India after escaping from Myanmar due to widespread discrimination, violence and bloodshed against the community there.

Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme Court

  Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme Court Firecrackers Banned For Diwali In Delhi By Supreme CourtThe court said its order in September removing the ban would be effective from November, adding that it wants to test the effect of the ban on air quality after Diwali, the festival when millions across India celebrate by bursting crackers.

On the way to NDTV. Click here if loading long time.

India's Supreme Court has heard arguments from the government and the two Rohingya , who have petitioned against the government ' s plan to deport the "I do not know what the government is thinking when it is talking of deportation ," Nair said. "If refugees are sent back forcibly, they will

Earlier this week, a group of eminent personalities had urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to not deport Rohingya refugees and asylum-seekers, saying a proposal that the entire community is a threat to national security is basedon "false assumption".

Also read on MSN: Rohingya Muslims threat to national security, Govt to Supreme Court

In an open letter, 51 prominent names including Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, former home minister P Chidambaram, former Union home secretary G K Pillai among others, observed that as an aspiring global leader, India cannot afford to adopt a "shortsighted approach".

Death by hanging: SC asks govt if this is best way to execute convicts .
<p>Supreme Court’s observation came 34 years after it upheld the legal validity of the provision of hanging as the mode of execution of death sentence and refused to strike down section 354(5) of the CrPC.</p>A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra signalled that in the light of progress made by science it was willing to review a 34-year-old decision backing hanging as the legal method of execution in India.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!