India Supreme Court refuses to defer Ayodhya case, hearings from February 8: 10 points

06:36  06 december  2017
06:36  06 december  2017 Source:   NDTV

Conor McGregor turns up to court after judge ordered him to face speeding charge

  Conor McGregor turns up to court after judge ordered him to face speeding charge <p>Conor McGregor turns up to court after judge ordered him to face speeding charge</p>The 'Notorious' star was due to appear in Blanchardstown District Court today to face the charge but sent a solicitor to handle the case in his absence.

New Delhi: A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will begin on February 8 next year, its final hearing over the disputed Ayodhya site that is There were heated arguments in court today as the Sunni Wakf Board sought that the hearing be deferred to after national elections are held in 2019.

New Delhi: Congress leader Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Sunni Waqf Board in the Ayodhya title suit, gave a new twist to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute on Tuesday by urging the Supreme Court to defer hearing in the case till July 2019 after the next Lok Sabha elections get over.

Ayodhya case: On December 6, 1992, right-wing activists razed the Babri mosque in Ayodhya © NDTV Ayodhya case: On December 6, 1992, right-wing activists razed the Babri mosque in Ayodhya NEW DELHI: A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will begin on February 8 next year, its final hearing over the disputed Ayodhya site that is claimed by both Hindus and Muslims, judges said on Tuesday, a day before the 25th anniversary of the demolition of the 16th-century Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992.

There were heated arguments in court today as the Sunni Wakf Board sought that the hearing be deferred to after national elections are held in 2019. The court turned down the request, saying it was "shocked."

Instant triple talaq non-bailable offence, 3 years jail, fine for guilty, says draft law

  Instant triple talaq non-bailable offence, 3 years jail, fine for guilty, says draft law Instant triple talaq non-bailable offence, 3 years jail, fine for guilty, says draft lawThe draft law — Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act — also allows a woman who has been given instant triple talaq to move court, seeking “subsistence allowance” for herself and dependent children, as well as custody of minor children. A Bill to this effect is likely to be tabled in the winter session of Parliament, highly placed government sources said on Friday.

The Supreme Court on Friday decided to hold the final hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute from December 5 The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla.

In Re : Case Assignment and Court Service Schedule in Judicial Election

Ayodhya Babri Masjid case: Will Yogi finish what Kalyan started?

Here is your 10-point cheatsheet to the story:

- At one point today, senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Dushyant Dave and Rajiv Dhawan, representing different Muslim petitioners who wanted the case deferred, threatened to walk out of court, alleging that they were "not being given a fair chance."

- Kapil Sibal, senior Congress leader and former union minister who is representing the Sunni board, argued that the hearing must be deferred as building a Ram temple at the disputed site is a part of the ruling BJP's manifesto. "BJP leader Dr Subramanian Swamy had gone on record saying that Ram temple would be built before 2019 through legal means. They want to make it as an election manifesto and the court should not fall into the trap. These appeals are not ordinary property disputes as they go to the heart of secular fabric of the country," Mr Sibal said. He also said he needs time as there are 90,000 pages of documents to go through.

Two Powerful British Women To Decide Vijay Mallya's Fate

  Two Powerful British Women To Decide Vijay Mallya's Fate Two Powerful British Women To Decide Vijay Mallya's FateArguing on behalf of Vijay Mallya will be Queen's counsel Clare Montgomery, a lawyer with extensive experience in extradition and international criminal law.

On the way to Statetimes. Click here if loading long time.

Claiming that the final verdict could have repercussions on the Indian polity, lawyers for the Sunni Wakf Board on Tuesday demanded before the Supreme Court bench hearing the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case that hearing be put off till Lok Sabha elections in July 2019.

- Senior lawyers Harish Salve and CS Vaidyanathan, who are representing Hindu organisations, objected, saying the court must treat the Ayodhya case like any other.

- "We are shocked and surprised," said Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, adding that the judges were "not bothered about what's happening outside." He pointed out that in August this year "all of you wanted the hearing in January and we posted today to hear the statement of facts. Now you want it to be postponed."

Also watch on MSN: (Video by the times of India)

- Thousands of right-wing activists had razed the Babri mosque in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992, claiming it was built on a temple marking the birthplace of Lord Ram, which was destroyed in the 16th century. 2,000 people were killed in the riots that followed the Babri Masjid demolition.

- In 2010, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court said the site should be shared between Hindus and Muslims. The verdict allotted two-thirds of the land to Hindus and said they could keep a makeshift temple that was built over the razed mosque's central dome.

25 years on in Ayodhya, mediation efforts leave lead players cold

  25 years on in Ayodhya, mediation efforts leave lead players cold 25 years on in Ayodhya, mediation efforts leave lead players coldIn the last three months, 24 fresh truckloads of stones have arrived at the workshop located 2 km from the disputed site - the first time since 2015, when previous Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav banned the movement of stones in Ayodhya.

/#/view/act/1937/6 You have used a legacy url, we will now provide you with a new hyperlink to use. We have located your resource and you will redirected. If you cannot use javascript, a main component of the new site, we provide an alternative.

blog 'cimenkroberts.blogdetik.com' is not exists. Reports of county courts cases and appeals

- Both Hindu and Muslim organisations involved in the dispute rejected the order and appealed against it to the Supreme Court, which, in March this year, suggested an out-of-court settlement as the preferred solution.

- Muslims make up about 13 per cent of India's population. Most of them are Sunni; properties owned by the community are handled by the Sunni Waqf Board which was given a third of the land in the 2010 verdict.

- The Shia Waqf Board, on the other hand, has proposed that the temple be built at the disputed site, while a "grand mosque" be built in state capital Lucknow. "If the Ram temple and mosque co-exist, it will lead to conflicts," the Shia body said, provoking fierce criticism from its Sunni counterpart, which says it alone is a party to the dispute with Hindu organisations.

- Its campaign for a Ram temple in Ayodhya propelled the BJP into a major political force in the 1990s, but in the last few years, the party relegated it to the back pages of its election manifestos even in Uttar Pradesh. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, a saffron-clad priest who took charge after the BJP's sweep in assembly elections this year, has asserted that building a Ram temple is a key agenda.

Talwars' acquittal challenged in Supreme Court by domestic help Hemraj's wife .
Talwars' acquittal challenged in Supreme Court by domestic help Hemraj's wifeIn October, the Talwars, who are both dentists, were found not guilty by the Allahabad High Court of the double murder in their flat in Noida in 2008.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
This is interesting!