India AIMPLB removes cleric Nadvi after his remarks over Babri issue

20:05  11 february  2018
20:05  11 february  2018 Source:   Hindustan Times

On Video, Top UP Police Officer Pledges To Build Ram Temple

  On Video, Top UP Police Officer Pledges To Build Ram Temple On Video, Top UP Police Officer Pledges To Build Ram Temple"We, Ram bhakts, in this programme, pledge that a grand Ram temple will be built soonest. Jai Sri Ram," say the men present at the function, reportedly held at Lucknow University. Among them is Surya Kumar Shukla, a senior IPS or Indian Police Service Officer of the 1982 batch of the UP cadre at present posted as the state's director general of Home Guards. Mr Shukla, wearing a grey jacket, is seen in the video standing to the left of the man who administered the pledge.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board ’s ( AIMPLB ) member on Sunday informed that the committee has decided to remove Moulana Salman Husaini Nadvi ’s from the board. “The board reiterated its uncompromising stand on Babri Masjid issue .

The Board rejected Nadvi ’s proposal, ruling out any compromise on Babri Masjid. Board has taken a stand that it will accept the court verdict: AIMPLB . Salman Nadvi gave a clarification in the Board 's executive meeting about his proposal. Sources said he was isolated over the issue in the meeting

(Video provided by The Times of India)

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board’s (AIMPLB) member on Sunday informed that the committee has decided to remove Moulana Salman Husaini Nadvi’s from the board. “The board reiterated its uncompromising stand on Babri Masjid issue. Salman Nadvi is still speaking against the board stand. So the board was left with no other option. The committee has unanimously decided to remove him,” said Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas, AIMPLB member.

Earlier, AIMPLB chairman Zafayb Jilani had said they have handed over the Nadvi case to the committee. Sunday is the last day of the plenary meeting and will end after the big public meet in the evening.

Ayodhya case: Story of 2 verdicts since 1949 and a 7-year wait in Supreme Court

  Ayodhya case: Story of 2 verdicts since 1949 and a 7-year wait in Supreme Court Ayodhya case: Story of 2 verdicts since 1949 and a 7-year wait in Supreme CourtIn 1949, the Faizabad civil court order came which stated, "all the three sets of parties, i.e. Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara are declared joint title holders of the property/premises in dispute to the extent of one third share each for using and managing the same for worshipping.

Hussain Nadvi , an executive member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board ( AIMPLB ), who met Art of Nadvi , renewing his effort to mediate in the Ayodhya dispute, even as final hearing on the Babri of action vis-a-vis Maulana Nadvi , after he expressed divergent views on the Ayodhya issue .

Presidential address was given by AIMPLB president Maulana Rabey Hasni Nadvi in the morning session As far as the Babri masjid is concerned, the people who compromise on the masjid issue will be Is the government failing to rule the nation; BJP slammed over Rafale deal; more. Top Takes.

Earlier, talking to the media, Nadvi had threatened to remove Jilani from Sunni Waqf Board’s lawyer. Jilani, to this, said, “He can do whatever he wants. We have been fighting since 1986, the time when he (Nadvi) was not included in the fight (Babri Masjid).”

On February 9, Maulana Salman Husaini Nadvi spoke to ANI about his meeting with Sri Sri Ravi Shankar where he extended support to the construction of Ram temple and said that their priority is to join hearts of people.

He also hinted at an out of court settlement by saying, “The courts do not join people’s heart as the verdict is always in favour of one and against the other.”

a statue of a man © Provided by Hindustan Times

Referring to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s issue, Jilani said that they cannot give the mosque to anyone. The Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute is a century-old issue between Hindus and Muslims over a piece of land, which is claimed by the former to be the birthplace of Hindu Lord Ram and thus entitled for construction of a Ram Temple.

In Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, Supreme Court sets March 14 as next date of hearing: 10 points

  In Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, Supreme Court sets March 14 as next date of hearing: 10 points In Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, Supreme Court sets March 14 as next date of hearing: 10 pointsThe Allahabad High Court had divided the disputed site in Ayodhya between Nirmohi Akhara, Ram Lalla and Sunni Waqf Board.

Feb 9: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board ( AIMPLB ), the apex body of Indian Muslims, on Friday ruled out any compromise on Babri Masjid, rejecting Salman Nadvi gave a clarification in the Board’s executive meeting about his proposal. Sources said he was isolated over the issue in the

Presidential address was given by AIMPLB president Maulana Rabey Hasni Nadvi in the morning Second White House aide resigns over domestic abuse claims. Don't want Maldives to be another flashpoint, in talks with India : China. As CBI court holds Babri hearings, temple issue hots up in UP.

The Babri Masjid, built in 1528-29 CE, was demolished by Hindu Karsevaks on December 6, 1992 in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, which caused massive riots across the country.

The case is now pending in the Supreme Court.

On Thursday, the three-judge Supreme Court bench fixed March 14 as the next date of hearing in Ayodhya case as some of the documents and translations were yet to be filed before the apex court.

'I'm Minister Because Of PM Narendra Modi's Advice,' Says OPS .
'I'm Minister Because Of PM Narendra Modi's Advice,' Says OPSAt an AIADMK meeting in Tamil Nadu's Theni on Friday, O Panneerselvam or OPS told the party workers that it was PM Modi on whose advice he agreed to merge the two faction of AIADMK and join the government as a minister, shifting from his earlier demand for the top job. The issue came up during a courtesy meeting he had with PM Modi in New Delhi last year, he said.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!