India Supreme Court to begin hearing pleas challenging Section 377 today

06:35  10 july  2018
06:35  10 july  2018 Source:   hindustantimes.com

Nirbhaya case: Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on review pleas today

  Nirbhaya case: Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on review pleas today Nirbhaya case: Supreme Court likely to pronounce verdict on review pleas todayThe apex court had on May 4 reserved its order on the review petitions filed by the convicts-- Pawan Gupta(31), Vinay Sharma (25), and Mukesh (31).

New Delhi, July 10: The Supreme Court will begin hearing on the pleas that challenged Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code today . Under challenge is the criminalisation of gay sex, which the Supreme Court had decided to review.

The Supreme Court today refused to delay hearing a batch of petitions challenging the Indian Penal Code's Section 377 , which in effect criminalises homosexuality. The Centre had filed a petition in the Supreme Court , requesting four more weeks to file its response in the matter.

  Supreme Court to begin hearing pleas challenging Section 377 today © Getty

The legal arguments against Section 377 that will be heard by a constitution bench of the Supreme Court beginning Tuesday will quote from a range of references, including Hindu philosophy and past judgments of the Supreme Court itself.

The five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra will hear petitions challenging Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. The law criminalizes non penile-vaginal intercourse, even between consenting adults. While everyone is covered under the law, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community are particularly affected.

The bench will hear six petitions and interventions filed by NGO Naz Foundation, parents of queer persons and Voices Against 377, a collective of human rights groups, among others. In all, 35 individuals have come before the court, which signals a growing confidence in the community to come out in the public eye and claim their sexual orientation and gender identity.

Nirbhaya's Rapists Will Hang, Supreme Court Rejects Convicts' Plea

  Nirbhaya's Rapists Will Hang, Supreme Court Rejects Convicts' Plea Nirbhaya's Rapists Will Hang, Supreme Court Rejects Convicts' PleaThe top court's decision came on a review plea filed by three of the four convicts seeking reduction of their death sentence to a life term. The convicts have one more legal option of challenging their sentence before they appeal to the President for mercy.

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to adjourn Wednesday's proposed hearing by a five-judge Constitution bench on a batch of petitions challenging Section 377 refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal inter course against the order of nature with any man, woman or

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to defer the hearing , scheduled for Tuesday, on a clutch of petitions against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code that criminalises homosexuality. The Centre, which has challenged the criminalisation of gay sex by the top court in 2013

The petitions use previous Supreme Court verdicts, such as the 2014 National Legal Services Authority (Nalsa) versus Union of India judgment, which granted equal social and legal status to the transgender community, and the 2017 Justice K.S Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr versus Union of India, which recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right, stating that sexual orientation was an essential attribute of privacy. They also speak of the various kinds of discrimination, sexual violence and distress that LGBTQ persons face on account of the law.

On Monday, the court also accepted an intervention application filed by Mumbai-based activist Harish Iyer, which uses references from the Bhagavad Gita, Vedic texts, even the Kama Sutra.

"Justice To All": Nirbhaya's Mother As Court Confirms Death For Rapists

  "Justice To All": Nirbhaya's Mother As Court Confirms Death For Rapists"It is justice to all," said Nirbhaya's mother Asha Devi, who was present in court for the verdict. But she said their "struggle does not end here", referring to the legal steps that still remain before the death sentence is carried out. The convicts can file one more petition challenging their sentence before they ask the President for mercy.

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments against Section 377 of the IPC today . The Chief Justice of India agreed to grant an early hearing , after members

New Delhi: The Supreme Court will hear in open court on Tuesday a curative petition of gay activists challenging its verdict criminalising homosexuality in the While setting aside the July 2, 2009 verdict of Delhi High Court , the apex court had held that Section 377 of IPC does not suffer from the vice of

a man that is standing in the grass © Provided by Hindustan Times

“The Kama Shastra acknowledges third-gender marriages wherein same-s*x couples with great attachment and complete faith in one another get married,” the application quotes from the Kama Sutra.

“I have filed this application as an individual who has been directly affected by Section 377. Over the past decade, I have faced prejudice,” Iyer said.

The hearing will begin with Navtej Singh Johar versus Union of India, which was filed in 2016. The petitioners include Johar, a Sangeet Natak Akademi awardee, chef and restaurateur Ritu Dalmia, hotelier Aman Nath, co-founder of Neemrana properties, and journalist Sunil Mehra. The same year, three Bangalore-based transgender women activists, including Akkai Padmashali, filed two petitions arguing that the section was in violation of the Nalsa verdict.

“When you yourself file this petition, you’re declaring yourself to be a criminal. It makes you vulnerable. But, I realized that if I didn’t do something about it, then I had no right to complain about it,” said Ritu Dalmia.

Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme Court

  Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme Court Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme CourtNew Delhi: A 150-year-old law that prescribes a life term in jail for gay sex is under spotlight as a five-judge Constitution Bench started hearing a bunch of petitions that call for its scrapping. The bench, however, said it would only examine the "correctness" of its verdict of 2013, which cancelled a Delhi High Court judgment that said the law criminalizing gay sex was "unconstitutional".

The matter has been forwarded to the chief justice of India to decide whether to hear it along with the other curative petitions pending in the case.

The court said that Keshav Suri’s plea would be heard along with other pleas by a Constitution bench.

DELHI, INDIA NOVEMBER 27: LGBT Community members and supporters during the Delhi Queer Pride March in New Delhi. (Photo by K Asif/India Today Group/Getty Images) © Getty DELHI, INDIA NOVEMBER 27: LGBT Community members and supporters during the Delhi Queer Pride March in New Delhi. (Photo by K Asif/India Today Group/Getty Images)

In April 2018, Lucknow-based activist Arif Jafar filed a petition. Jafar was incarcerated for 47 days under Section 377 for distributing condoms as part of his outreach work to prevent the spread of HIV/Aids 17 years ago. The same month, four more gay activists associated with Mumbai-based organization Humsafar Trust, which works in the field of HIV/Aids prevention, filed a petition. In May, current and past students of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), filed a petition challenging the section on grounds that it violates Articles 14, 15, 16, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. These articles pertain to fundamental rights of equality, freedom of expression and personal liberty.

On Monday, Central government counsel R Bala Subramanium requested that the hearing be adjourned till the centre could file a written response. Denying the request, the CJI said that the centre could file its reply during the course of the hearing.

Delhi being buried under garbage, Mumbai sinking, but govt does nothing: Supreme Court

  Delhi being buried under garbage, Mumbai sinking, but govt does nothing: Supreme Court Delhi being buried under garbage, Mumbai sinking, but govt does nothing: Supreme CourtThe apex court was also anguished over the garbage mess in the national capital. Referring to the recent apex court order on the powers of the Delhi government and Lieutenant Governor, a bench of Justices M B Lokur and Deepak Gupta asked them to inform it by tomorrow who was responsible for clearing of the three “mountains of garbage” (landfill sites) at Okhla, Bhalswa and Ghazipur in the national capital.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today (July 9) refused to adjourn tomorrow’s During the pendency of the curative petitions, the plea was made that an open court hearing should be granted and after the apex court agreed to it, several fresh writ petitions were filed seeking decriminalising of Section 377 .

A five-judge Constitution bench is scheduled to begin hearing the pleas from Tuesday. Supreme Court to hear petitions challenging Section 377 tomorrow, refuses to adjourn the hearing .

Since 2016, several LGBT petitioners have filed writs challenging the section. This has happened despite an adverse judgment by the Supreme Court of 2013, which reversed a 2009 judgment of the Delhi High Court that said that Section 377 was unconstitutional as it criminalized consenting same-s*x desiring adults. A series of curative petitions challenging its 2013 judgment are also before the Supreme Court. Suresh Kumar Koushal, a Delhi-based astrologer who had moved the Supreme Court against the Delhi HC verdict, said, “In 2018, our country’s moral degradation is for everyone to see. Our society is weaker when compared to 2013 we need all these laws even more today.” However, his lawyer confirmed that they have not impleaded themselves in the new petitions.

(Also watch: What people get wrong about section 377)

Lawyer tells Supreme Court that Babri Masjid was demolished by ‘Hindu Taliban’ .
Lawyer tells Supreme Court that Babri Masjid was demolished by ‘Hindu Taliban’The Shia Waqf Board told the Supreme Court on Friday that it wished to settle the matter of the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple dispute in Ayodhya amicably. However, a lawyer for one of the appellants reportedly argued that the board had no locus to speak in the case.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!