India Centre puts onus on Supreme Court on decriminalising homosexuality

13:21  11 july  2018
13:21  11 july  2018 Source:   indiatoday.in

Adultery should remain a crime for sanctity of marriage: Centre tells Supreme Court

  Adultery should remain a crime for sanctity of marriage: Centre tells Supreme Court Adultery should remain a crime for sanctity of marriage: Centre tells Supreme CourtThe Centre on Wednesday contended that adultery should remain an offence and opposed a petition before the Supreme Court that sought to make men and women equally liable under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. A Constitution bench of the Supreme Court is re-examining the constitutionality of Section 497 of IPC that incorporates provisions for the adultery law.

The Centre on Tuesday put the onus of deciding the fate of Section 377 on the Supreme Court (SC), which a day earlier began hearing petitions under the provision that criminalises homosexuality ."Let court decide, leave decision to wisdom of court

As the Indian supreme court begins a landmark hearing on homosexuality on Tuesday, gay men and women and human rights activists hope they are finally on the last leg of a 20-year legal battle to decriminalise gay sex.

  Centre puts onus on Supreme Court on decriminalising homosexuality © Getty Images

The constitutionality of the Indian Penal Code's Section 377, which criminalises homosexuality, is best decided by the Supreme Court, the government of India today said. The Centre said that it will leave the decision of decriminalising Section 377 to the wisdom of court.

The Centre made these comments in an affidavit filed by Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The affidavit was submitted in the Supreme Court over during an ongoing hearing on petitions filed against the court's 2013 ruling that in effect re-criminalised homosexuality.

The Centre also told the Supreme Court that while it would leave the issue of decriminalising homosexuality to the court, there should be safeguards against bestiality and harassment of children. ASG Mehta told the court that "perversions" such as incest and bestiality should not be allowed.

Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme Court

  Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme Court Will Examine Correctness Of 2013 Verdict On Gay Sex, Says Supreme CourtNew Delhi: A 150-year-old law that prescribes a life term in jail for gay sex is under spotlight as a five-judge Constitution Bench started hearing a bunch of petitions that call for its scrapping. The bench, however, said it would only examine the "correctness" of its verdict of 2013, which cancelled a Delhi High Court judgment that said the law criminalizing gay sex was "unconstitutional".

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in the United States of America vary by jurisdiction. Since June 26, 2003, sexual activity between consenting adults of the same sex as well

LGBT Students Of IIT Move Supreme Court Seeking Quashing Of Section 377 - Продолжительность: 2:59 Mirror Now 633 просмотра. Новинка! Newshour Debate: Time to decriminalise homosexuality ?

To this, Justice Chandrachud, who is on the five-judge Constitution bench hearing the matter, retorted that the Supreme Court is not considering kinks in sexual behaviour. "We want that two gay men holding hands and walking down Marine Drive are not arrested," Justice Chandrachud said.

Meanwhile, as the Centre filed its affidavit, Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra made an observation: What if the Supreme Court does not confine the current hearings to homosexuality and instead goes into the larger nature of debate around Section 377, including the matter of consensual sexual activity between adults?

The Supreme Court is currently hearing a bunch of petitions that have challenged the court's own order from 2013. That order had overturned a 2009 Delhi High Court judgment that read down the provisions of IPC Section 377 to in effect decriminalise homosexuality.

Mobocracy can't be allowed, law needed to prevent lynchings: Supreme Court

  Mobocracy can't be allowed, law needed to prevent lynchings: Supreme Court Mobocracy can't be allowed, law needed to prevent lynchings: Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court also recommended that the government bring legislation that specifically targets lynching. Readers must note that the Supreme Court cannot direct Parliament or the government to draft any law or legislation, it can only recommend doing so.

India's Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt a blow to gay rights by striking down a 2009 lower court decision to decriminalize homosexuality . The Court said only the legislature could a colonial-era law criminalizing homosexuality .

Gay sex is illegal in 32 African countries, including Kenya, where it is punishable by up to 14 years in jail. Kenya's High Court will soon deliver its

Section 377 was a law enacted in 1861 by the British and which provides for prison terms for anybody who "voluntarily has carnal inter¬course against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal."

(With inputs from Anusha Soni)

Also Watch- Section 377: Will Supreme Court make history

(Video provided NDTV)

Lawyer tells Supreme Court that Babri Masjid was demolished by ‘Hindu Taliban’ .
Lawyer tells Supreme Court that Babri Masjid was demolished by ‘Hindu Taliban’The Shia Waqf Board told the Supreme Court on Friday that it wished to settle the matter of the Babri Masjid-Ram Temple dispute in Ayodhya amicably. However, a lawyer for one of the appellants reportedly argued that the board had no locus to speak in the case.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!