US News Prosecutor Threw Away Slam Dunk Cases Against Weinstein and Trump Kids

17:46  11 october  2017
17:46  11 october  2017 Source:   The Daily Beast

Meryl Streep speaks out against Harvey Weinstein

  Meryl Streep speaks out against Harvey Weinstein Following sexual harassment allegations against producer."The disgraceful news about Harvey Weinstein has appalled those of us whose work he championed, and those whose good and worthy causes he supported," Streep began in a statement published by The Huffington Post.

For a prosecutor the factual question is whether Weinstein in fact made sexual contact with her without her consent. Vance’s refusal to prosecute the Trumps is just as disheartening, and just as difficult to explain. cases - against - weinstein - and - trump - kids .

Search Menu. Home / News. The case against an alleged Ottawa extremist who police say recruited for ISIL".

  Prosecutor Threw Away Slam Dunk Cases Against Weinstein and Trump Kids © Photo Illustration by Elizabeth Brockway/The Daily Beast Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Harvey Weinstein, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr. have one thing in common: They were all spared by Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance. 

In each of their cases, Vance declined to prosecute. In the case of the Trumps, Vance claims he “made the right call.” In the case of Weinstein, he claims there was insufficient evidence. He is wrong in both cases.

This week he claimed he couldn’t prosecute Weinstein because he lacked sufficient proof of Weinstein’s criminal intent when he allegedly groped Ambra Battilana in New York in March 2015. In fact, the evidence against Weinstein for sexual abuse is overwhelming.

ESPN Suspends Anchor Jemele Hill for 2 Weeks

  ESPN Suspends Anchor Jemele Hill for 2 Weeks (BRISTOL, Conn.) — ESPN anchor Jemele Hill has been suspended by the network for two weeks for making political statements on social media. ESPN anchor Jemele Hill has been suspended by the network for two weeks for making political statements on social media.

It's another SLAM as ABs crush England.

blog 'kristinaustin.blogdetik.com' is not exists. Rand McNally Kids Road Atlas (Backseat Books) epub pdf txt.

Video: Harvey Weinstein: What we know so far (Provided by PA) 

What to watch next
  • Yorkshire devolution: Should it happen?

    Yorkshire devolution: Should it happen?

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:07
  • Boris Johnson struggles with No.10 door

    Boris Johnson struggles with No.10 door

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:34
  • 3,168 meters long - Asia's longest zip wire

    3,168 meters long - Asia's longest zip wire

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:43
  • Dashcam footage shows police chasing stolen ambulance

    Dashcam footage shows police chasing stolen ambulance

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:41
  • World Mental Health Day: Dog dementia therapy

    World Mental Health Day: Dog dementia therapy

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:04
  • Theresa May is challenged by a student over stop and search

    Theresa May is challenged by a student over stop and search

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:29
  • Theresa May's Brexit statement in 90 seconds

    Theresa May's Brexit statement in 90 seconds

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:24
  • 'They'll send in the army' - Barcelona-based British author on Catalonian independence

    'They'll send in the army' - Barcelona-based British author on Catalonian independence

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:26
  • Helicopter rescues family stuck during Snowdonia walk

    Helicopter rescues family stuck during Snowdonia walk

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:47
  • Las Vegas Strip goes dark a week after shooting

    Las Vegas Strip goes dark a week after shooting

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:32
  • Rwanda genocide survivor forgives his father's killers

    Rwanda genocide survivor forgives his father's killers

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    2:14
  • Natural History Museum incident - what we know so far

    Natural History Museum incident - what we know so far

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:43
  • Wlliam hails 'fantastic' mental health campaign as £2m boost announced

    Wlliam hails 'fantastic' mental health campaign as £2m boost announced

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:37
  • Conkers enthusiasts sling it out in world championships

    Conkers enthusiasts sling it out in world championships

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:51
  • Ruth Davidson says she is not looking past 2021

    Ruth Davidson says she is not looking past 2021

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    1:20
  • Nicola Sturgeon on Theresa May: A weak prime minister presiding over a deeply divided party

    Nicola Sturgeon on Theresa May: A weak prime minister presiding over a deeply divided party

    Press Association Logo
    Press Association
    0:54
UP NEXT
UP NEXT

The charge here, a misdemeanor, simply requires proof of sexual contact without consent. (There is also the likely charge of harassment.) The NYPD with Battilana’s consent secretly taped Weinstein aggressively entreating her—despite her pleas to stop—to come into his room, watch him shower, and submit to his sexual advances. Weinstein admits his conduct, wants to do it again, and tries to exploit his powerful position to force the young woman to succumb. When she tells him he engaged in sexual contact with her the day before, and it made her so uncomfortable, Weinstein agrees, and says he won’t do it again. His intent is unmistakable.

Barack and Michelle Obama Say They're 'Disgusted' by Allegations Against Donor Harvey Weinstein

  Barack and Michelle Obama Say They're 'Disgusted' by Allegations Against Donor Harvey Weinstein Five days after the New York Times report emerged about the decades of sexual harassment allegations levied against Harvey Weinstein, Barack and Michelle Obama released a statement condemning the behavior of the Hollywood mogul and major Democratic donor who had also employed their daughter. “Michelle and I have been disgusted by the recent reports about Harvey Weinstein. Any man who demeans and degrades women in such fashion needs to be condemned and held accountable, regardless of wealth or status,” the former President and First Lady said Tuesday. “We should celebrate the courage of women who have come forward to tell these painful stories.

blog 'courtneygrubbs.blogdetik.com' is not exists. Throw away your resume! eBook.

blog 'bryanjenkins.blogdetik.com' is not exists. STAT #3: Slam Dunk : Standing Tall and Talented epub pdf txt.

For a prosecutor the factual question is whether Weinstein in fact made sexual contact with her without her consent. That’s the charge, and the victim will testify to that, and the tape strongly corroborates her account. Vance’s claim that the crime is not prosecutable because there is insufficient evidence of criminal intent is not only unconvincing, it is preposterous.

Moreover, Vance’s criticism of the police for not involving his office in the victim’s taping of Weinstein is a very weak excuse. Whatever the protocols for police-prosecution cooperation, it’s not clear how the DA’s involvement in the recorded trap of Weinstein would have made a difference, or would have made the case more probative, or Weinstein’s guilt more convincing. The recording is damning as is.

Slideshow: Celebrity reactions to Harvey Weinstein scandal (Provided by GES)

As with the Weinstein case, Vance has given a number of explanations for dropping the Trump case. He claimed there was insufficient evidence that the Trumps had broken the law, but also that the victims were really not victims and in any event they were unwilling to cooperate with his office. 

Vance’s refusal to prosecute the Trumps is just as disheartening, and just as difficult to explain.

Last week, as reported in an exhaustive report by The New Yorker, ProPublica, and WNYC, Vance overruled prosecutors in his office who were making a clearly prosecutable case against Ivanka and Donald Jr. for luring prospective buyers of a Trump luxury development in SoHo by making false and deceptive promotions. The Trumps, as the prosecution’s evidence shows convincingly, used Enron-like come-ons to intentionally inflate the value of the development to induce investors to buy units.

The prosecutors discovered numerous emails by the Trumps which showed how they repeatedly lied to buyers. The emails, according to persons who viewed them, had the Trumps discuss how to coordinate the false information they had given to prospective buyers; Donald Jr. tell a broker that nobody would ever find out because people on the email chain or in the Trump Organization knew about the deception; and that the Trumps approved, knew of, agreed to, and intentionally inflated the numbers to make more sales. In other words, the emails proved the Trumps knew what they were doing was wrong.

Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric Trump © AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric Trump Based on these emails, documentary evidence, and interviews with buyers, the prosecutors had assembled sufficient evidence of the Trumps’ criminal conduct to impanel a grand jury. But that was before Vance met with the Trumps’ lawyer, Marc Kasowitz. Before and after Vance overruled his prosecutors, Kasowitz made large donations to his re-eletion campaign.

Again, Vance’s explanations are not convincing. First, Vance argues that it’s “ludicrous” to believe that Kasowitz’s money mattered, or that his office is “for sale.” But the way Vance did it, according to close observers, was “unusual,” “curious,” and “didn’t have an air you’d like.” Vance went over the heads of his line prosecutors who were conducting the investigation for two years and he overruled their decision to move ahead with the case. 

Moreover, while for any prosecutor a criminal fraud investigation can be complex and challenging, the evidence against the Trumps of fraud, deception, and misrepresentation was solid. The emails themselves are devastating, just like the tape of Weinstein. Nor have the Trumps ever disputed any of the factual allegations, the contents of the emails, or the deceptive ways they promoted the SoHo development.

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance © Albin Lohr-Jones/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance Nor should the fact that many of the buyers settled a civil suit with the Trumps have impeded prosecution, as Vance claimed. His statement that “the victims didn’t strike me as victims” is peculiar. In most corruption cases, there often are no victims. Corruption and fraud crimes typically are committed in secret, without anybody complaining, because participants in these nefarious arrangements may be pleased with the resulting benefits.

But a responsible prosecutor investigating fraud and corruption looks mainly at what the perpetrator did; that’s where the crime happens. For purposes of the deterrent value of the criminal law, it really is irrelevant whether persons whom the perpetrator sought to cheat actually lost money or not, or whether they have been “victimized.” 

Finally, perhaps the most troubling of all of Vance’s excuses is his claim that the biggest impediment to prosecution was the victims’ agreement not to cooperate with the DA as a stipulation of the settlement victims reached with the Trumps. From an ethical standpoint, this condition is offensive; it corrupts the administration of justice by impeding a prosecutor from conducting a responsible criminal investigation. One wonders whether Vance would do the same thing if the victim of a vicious assault, say on a child, refused to cooperate with the prosecution after the victim’s family received a huge sum of money from the perpetrator as a condition of not complaining. Or if a prosecutor was investigating the mob, would he reluctantly throw in the towel if witnesses were afraid to come forward?

A prosecutor possesses awesome weaponry to investigate crime and force witnesses to testify: the investigating grand jury, the issuance of subpoenas, and compulsion of testimony through grants of immunity. There was no legal or practical impediment to continuing the investigation of the Trumps and compelling the testimony of investors who were defrauded.

“Celebrity” prosecutions are sometimes difficult. The celebrities hire the best lawyers, and celebrity status might impress juries. Why Vance was gun-shy in prosecuting Weinstein and the Trumps is hard to know. Whether his reluctance speaks to his honesty, judgment, or competence, is unclear. But his excuses in both cases for not prosecuting are extremely troubling, and do not inspire confidence in his impartial and aggressive enforcement of criminal law.

'There was one Irish broadcaster who would sit beside you and remove his clothes below the waist' .
'There was one Irish broadcaster who would sit beside you and remove his clothes below the waist'The co-founder of the Communications Clinic joined a long line of high profile women who have shed light on abuses by powerful men in the wake of allegations against the disgraced producer.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
This is interesting!